Admission requirements
Students who want to take this course must be admitted to the Comparative Criminal Justice master’s programme.
Description
The criminal justice landscape is changing rapidly, both on a national and supranational level, partly as a result of globalization, transnational crime problems, and the preoccupation with risk. New actors are entering the stage of crime control, or what may be more accurately called ‘risk management’. For example, private companies such as G4S and Serco are significant forces to be reckoned with in the field of security. What does this mean for the role of the police and the nation-state in the criminal justice process? And has the law been able to keep with such developments in terms of the regulation of policing and the response to improper conduct on the part of public and private actors therein?
This course discusses the changing contours of policing in a comparative perspective. Students will gain an insight into how different actors in policing exercise power and how this exercise of power is regulated, and what this means for compliance and legitimacy. They will also learn to examine these issues in relation to the relevant social, cultural and political context. During the course, we will identify processes of convergence and divergence that can explain differences and similarities between (or even within) countries in the area of policing. Students will also deepen their understanding of the complex relationship between power, compliance, and legitimacy. These constructs can be studied at different levels of analysis; for instance, in relation to countries as a whole, but also in relation to institutions within a country. The course will also examine the role of private actors in policing, including the commodification of security, and what this means for effectiveness, accountability and legitimacy.
The comparative approach in this course is not limited to specific continents or countries and, by the end of the course, students will be able to assess the challenges to legitimacy of actors in public and private policing in Western-European countries and the US, but also in, for example, Latin-American or Asian countries. Students will benefit from guest lectures from experts and, where possible, field trips to criminal justice institutions.
Course objectives
Objectives of the course
Upon completing this course, students will be able to:
Analyse key developments in public and private policing in a comparative perspective
Critically evaluate the consequences in the field of criminal justice of the involvement of private actors in policing
Use a comparative approach to assess the implications for compliance and legitimacy of the way power is exercised and regulated by public and private actors in policing
Reflect on the added value and limitations of a comparative approach to the study of criminal justice issues and actors in the field of policing
Timetable
Check MyTimetable.
Mode of instruction
Lectures
Number of (2 hour) lectures: 4
Names of lecturers: Dr. T.D. Peeters and Dr. A. Mosna
Required preparation by students: mandatory reading to be announced.
Seminars
Number of (2 hour) seminars: 4
Names of instructors: Dr. T.D. Peeters and Dr. A. Mosna
Required preparation by students: mandatory reading to be announced.
Other methods of instruction
Weekly office hours.
Students who wish to ask a question during office hours should send an email to the secretarial office (criminologie@law.leidenuniv.nl) in advance with a short description of the reason.
Assessment method
Examination form(s)
Written comparative paper (50%)
Group assignment video presentation (vlog) (25%) and indiviudal position paper (25%)
All requirements mentioned above have to be met and the three components of the final grade should be at least a 5.5 in order to complete the course successfully. If this is not the case, the grade that will be registered as final grade cannot exceed a 5.
There will be a re-sit for all three assignments.
Written assignments that are marked with a ‘fail’ grade at the first attempt can be repaired (one attempt). This means that the assignment is improved with feedback from the teacher. The grade of a repair attempt is capped at 6.0. To receive a grade in the full grading range, the student can choose to submit an entirely new assignment (question or assignment will be provided by the teacher).
Deadline extensions are given only when advised by the study advisor. If you need an extension, please contact your study advisor on time.
The partial exams that have been finished with a passing grade, will be valid up to and including the academic year following the year in which the grade has been achieved. To this there is one exception: when the learning objectives, content, design or examination of a course has been changed, the course coordinator can decide that the validity of the partial exam concerned has expired due to didactic reasons. This will be stated in the course description of the academic year in which the change(s) will be implemented.
Submission procedures
Assignments are submitted electronically through Brightspace.
Reading list
Obligatory course materials
Literature:
- Mandatory and recommended reading will be listed in the course handbook and on Brightspace.
Registration
Registration for courses and exams takes place via MyStudymap. If you do not have access to MyStudymap (guest students), look here (under the Law-tab) for more information on the registration procedure in your situation.
Contact
Coordinator: Dr. T.D. Peeters and Dr. A. Mosna
Telephone number secretariat: +71 527 7518 / 7462
Institution/division
Institute: Criminology
Department: Criminal Law and Criminology
Room number secretary: B3.11
Opening hours: 9AM-4PM
Telephone number secretariat: +71 527 7518 / 7462