There are no pre-requisites for this 100-level course, which is designed for ‘reflective connection’ with material from many other sustainability courses at LUC. It gives access to 200-level courses in the majors of Sustainability and Human Interaction.
The course is organized in four ‘outlooks’, that is to say, four typical ways of perceiving the essential features of the world when it comes to sustainability problems and futures. These four outlooks are:
• Looking at the world, I see RESOURCES
• Looking at the world, I see NATURE
• Looking at the world, I see SYSTEM
• Looking at the world, I see OURSELVES.
Each outlook has a certain history but also a certain perennial pattern of discourse. In the course, we will discuss both.
After successful completion of the course, students
• can recognize, understand and work with alternative ways to perceive and frame sustainability problems and futures
• can refer to classic authors of environmental science with critical understanding
Please see the LUC website: www.lucthehague.nl
Mode of instruction
This is a ‘literature-based’ course, formatted in such a way that students will reach an active comprehension of the ‘classic’ pieces (articles, book excerpts etc.) that will be read and discussed. The pieces will be grouped in 7 clusters, meaning that each outlook will be covered in usually two clusters each. Each cluster will have a total number of pages such that it can be treated in one week.
The course meets for seven weeks. The literature will be studied in seven cycles, each composed of three sessions that hinge around the same cluster of literature:
- Session 1 (2nd hour on Tuesdays) will introduce the literature of that week and introduce the instructor’s questions on the literature. All students get the same questions.
• Session 2 (two hours on Thursdays) will be devoted to a discussion of the literature, based on the students’ answers to the questions.
• Session 3 (1st hour on Tuesdays) will focus on presentation and discussion of response papers written at home by the students reflecting on the literature. Paper subjects are decided by the instructor but based on the students’ own proposals at the end of session 2. Papers are to be formatted in Powerpoint, with ‘Notes’ added to give more text if needed. Students to present their essays will initially be selected randomly in each session, with some room for selected cases later in the course.
Students work individually. On request and incidentally, permission can be given to work with two or three on a topic.
All answers to the instructor’s questions and all papers are to be handed in, in print except if all printers near the student are broken down, at the beginning of each session in which they will be discussed, i.e. session 2 for the questions and session 3 for the papers. Questions or papers handed in late will be graded but one point will be subtracted.
All answers and papers will be graded and the separate means of answers and papers will be calculated. In case a student has presented his/her paper, the grade for that essay will include the liveliness and structure of the presentation (weighted 50 percent). Allowing for sickness, other force majeure situations or one plain failure, two missing or worst marks will be dropped from the assessment. The two means will count for 40 percent of the final mark each. The final 20 percent goes to liveliness and content quality of verbal participation.
This course is supported by a BlackBoard site
The sages at CML are continuously deliberating, as sages do, on what are really the most classic classics, most fun classics, most relevant classics and so on. The list below is the present state of outcome, giving you a feel of what it will be, approximately.
Outlook A: “Looking at the world, I see resources”
• Malthus: The principle of population
• Meadows: Limits to growth
• Brown: Outgrowing the earth
• Tiffen et al.: More people, less erosion
• Hardin: The tragedy of the commons
• Ostrom: Governing the commons
• Diamond: the collapse of civilizations
• (meta-level) Brox: the epistemological status of grand theory
Outlook B: “Looking at the world, I see nature”
• White: the historical roots of our environmental crisis
• Passmore: The traditions (mastership and stewardship of nature)
• Van Arkel: Society and technology: 30,000 years in shorthand
• Rolston: Philosophy gone wild
• Sessions: Sources of the deep ecology perspective
• Cheney: The neo-stoicism of deep ecology
Outlook C: “Looking at the world, I see system”
• Commoner: The closing circle
• Boulding: The economics of spaceship earth
• Lovelock: The Gaia hypothesis 1979
• Lovelock: The Gaia Hypothesis 2006
• Holling: The new ecology
Outlook D: “Looking at the world, I see ourselves”
• Haq: Islam and ecology
• Cheney: An etiquette for being here
• (meta-level) Dryzek: Framing the environmental problem
All literature will be made available on Blackboard, latest at the beginning of each Session 1
This course is only open for LUC The Hague students.
prof.dr. Wouter T. de Groot, email@example.com
The weekly program has not been detailed yet. As said however, students can take it that each week focuses on a cluster of some three or four papers, going through the four outlooks (i.e. week 1 starts with Malthus, Meadows, Brown and Tiffen, and so on). Within the weeks we follow the schedule as given in Course proceedings (i.e. 2nd hour Tuesday goes to Introduction, Thursday 2 hours to Discussion and next week’s Tuesday 1st hour to Presentations).