No extra admission requirements
This course will probe a foundational concept in Western history – barbarism. Although barbarism is rooted in one of the most rigid hierarchical oppositions (civilization vs. barbarism), the historical travels of the “barbarian” reveal the concept’s adaptability to diverse historical situations and geopolitical settings. Barbarism has a complex genealogy. It has been employed as the negative outside in a dyadic structure separating a civilized interior from a barbarian exterior; as the middle term in-between savagery and civilization in temporal structures delineating an evolutionary process; as an internalized aspect of the civilized psyche (e.g. in Freud) or, in the work of radical thinkers, as inextricable from, and concomitant with, civilization (e.g. in Walter Benjamin); and as a term that confuses hierarchical structures and fixed notions of space (eg. in Deleuze and Guattari). Barbarians have been the negative other in a traditional binary, but also conceived affirmatively, as agents of change and regeneration, both in philosophy (eg. Nietzsche) and in art.
This course will explore the shifting functions of this concept in various contexts through close-readings of literary, philosophical, ethnographic, and theoretical texts and artworks from the Greek antiquity to the present: from Euripides or Herodotus, Michel de Montaigne, and Edward Gibbon, to Friedrich Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, C.P. Cavafy, and Walter Benjamin, and from Aimé Césaire, J. M. Coetzee, and Zbigniew Herbert to G. Deleuze and F. Guattari, M. Hardt and A. Negri, Slavoj Zizek, Denys Arcand, Alessandro Baricco and others; from Greek tragedy and Enlightenment historiography to contemporary cultural and political theory; from the Roman “barbarian invasions” to 20th century popular culture; and from the “culturalization of conflict” since 1989 to the ongoing financial crisis and recent protest movements. We will particularly focus on works that mark shifts in the concept’s meanings, problematize or ironize dominant uses, propose affirmative mobilizations of the concept, or establish ruptures in existing discourses.
By focusing on barbarism, the course also aims at exploring alternative ways of “doing” conceptual history in the field of comparative literature. Students will be briefly acquainted with basic approaches within conceptual history, eg. in the German tradition of Begriffsgeschichte (Koselleck). But we will primarily consider conceptual history as a task for literary scholars, thereby developing interdisciplinary and more “literary” approaches. For example, we will read works from different genres in a “literary” manner, probing the performativity of barbarism in the rhetoric of the text; untangle the power structures involved in its uses; probe the relation between texts and their (ideological) subtexts; scrutinize tensions between the concept’s historical meanings and its signifying force in each present.
To further substantiate such a “literary” approach, we will focus on the fates of recurrent topoi, tropes, and figures that involve the barbarian. As sites of repetition and change, topoi repeat in order to confirm dominant discourses, but also open up the possibility for rupture or critique of the discourses they repeat. Topoi we will examine are: barbarians at the gates; barbarian invasions; the barbarian within; waiting for the barbarians; new barbarians; and positive barbarism.
The course has historical, theoretical, analytical, and methodological components and objectives. Specifically, students will:
- Gain in-depth knowledge of the main historical traditions of use of barbarism and turning points in the history of this notion.
- Be trained in probing the shifting functions of barbarism by close-reading works from various genres, with a specific focus on literary and artistic contexts.
- Be able to compare barbarism to related notions of otherness (eg. wild man, savage, animal etc.).
- Get acquainted with basic methodological approaches to conceptual history.
- Develop alternative ways of studying (the history of) concepts as literary scholars in transcultural, transhistorical, comparative perspectives.
Timetable on the website
Mode of instruction
Total course load: 280 hours
Seminar attendance: 42 hours (3 hours a week)
Study of compulsory literature: 160 hours
Preparing papers and presentation: 78 hours
Assessment and grading method (in percentages):.
- Mid-term paper: 30%
- Final paper: 60%
- Oral presentation and contributions to discussions on Blackboard: 10% (presentations and blackboard contributions are not graded, but are compulsory requirements. Failure to complete these requirements results in a 10% reduction of the final grade).
Blackboard will be used to provide students with an overview of current affairs, as well as specific information about (components of) the course.
Diverse articles and texts will be made available on Blackboard.
Primary literature to be purchased: To be announced.
Registration Studeren à la carte and Contractonderwijs
Registration Studeren à la carte via: www.hum.leidenuniv.nl/onderwijs/alacarte
Registration Contractonderwijs via: http://www.hum.leidenuniv.nl/onderwijs/contractonderwijs/
Media Studies student administration, P.N. van Eyckhof 4, room 102C. Tel. 071 5272144; .firstname.lastname@example.org.
Coordinator of studies: Mr. J. Donkers, MA, P.N. van Eyckhof 3, room 1.01b.