How can we understand art as an epistemological force: that is as a force that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge rather than simply representing it? Art as an ‘epistemological’ force is to consider art beyond just representation of the world, the cliché of art as knowledge, art as object or mere aesthetics.
Philosopher Chantal Mouffe raises the question: “Can artistic practices still play a critical role in a society where the difference between art and advertising has become blurred and where artists and cultural workers have become a necessary part of capitalist production?” Her question concerns the urgency and relevance of art, the critical role and function of art in our society as well as art’s inevitable entanglement with politics, ecology and philosophy, where action and theory become inseparable from each other. There is a growing number of artists engaging critically with the global challenges we are facing. In the aftermath of 9/11, artists responded to the World Trade Center attack or the incidents in the Abu Ghraib prison (e/g. Steve Reich, Alfredo Botero). Disasters such as the hurricane Katharina, the nuclear calamity at Fukushima in Japan (at the same time both natural and technological disasters) as well as political situations also met with various artistic responses, for instance the work and performances of the Chinese artist Ai Weiwei. In addition, artists are engaging with emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, biotechnology and warfare technology such as drones that impact our daily life significantly.
In this course, we will be investigating whether art addressing global issues does, can or even must have an impact on important societal and cultural issues, and take as out point of departure what it means to approach art beyond being an object and beyond representation, but to understand it as a force. From this perspective we ask: can art affect our reality, can art shape our understanding of the world? And if so, how can art do this? Can art contribute to the public debate without being engulfed by dominant political structures and neoliberal mechanisms? What is art’s contribution to the public debate?
In this course we will address these questions from the perspective of the epistemological force of art, by discussing philosophers/theorists such as Chantal Mouffe and Krzysztof Ziarek, as well as by analyzing works of art engaging global challenges.
Acquiring knowledge of and insight in art conceptualized as an epistemological force and the theories provided for the interpretation and analysis of the art works and cultural practices;
Learning how to make these theories productive in analyzing, evaluating and reflecting on art;
Understanding the differences and commonalties between an artistic and a theoretical approach of the world;
Insight into the cultural and societal role and function of art vis-à-vis global challenges;
Analyzing works of art and presenting the results of these analyses in oral presentations and academic papers.
The timetable is available on the Master Arts and Culture website
Mode of instruction
Seminar, 3 hours a week, in which students give presentations, participate in discussions, reflect on the issues discussed, collaborate in assignments, write papers;
The seminar will be concluded with a one-day symposium in which, in small groups, the students will present a theme/topic of their mutual interest.
Excursion to exhibition.
Attendance is compulsory. Students are allowed to miss a maximum of two seminars, provided they present a valid reason beforehand. Students who have missed more than two seminars will have to aply to the Examination Board of the Ma Arts and Culture in order to obtain permission to further follow and complete the course.
Seminars: 3 hours per week x 12 weeks: 36 hours;
Studying compulsory readings for seminars: 80 hours;
Preparing oral presentation: 40 hours (of which the symposium takes 10 hrs);
Midterm assignment: 44 hours;
Writing of final course paper: 80 (rereading texts, collecting research material, searching and reading additional literature, composing and writing of paper).
Midterm assignment (40%);
Symposium and final paper MA students 4.000 and ResMA students 5.000 words (60%).
To complete the final mark, please take notice of the following: the final mark for the course is established by determining the weighted average. Both the midterm assignment and the final paper need to be a pass.
In case of an unsatisfactory grade, the paper(s) needs to be reworked.
Please note that if you do not hand in your essay before the first deadline, your essay will be considered as the resit.
For the time tables exams 2017-2018 see; Timetable
How and when an exam review will take place will be disclosed together with the publication of the exam results at the latest. If a student requests a review within 30 days after publication of the exam results, an exam review will have to be organized.
Blackboard will be used for: For information and building up the glossary. The glossary will be build up from key-terms and concepts from the three assigned texts and need to be around 300 words, excl. references to sources.
Krzysztof Ziarek, The Force of Art, Stanford University Press 2004.;
Chantal Mouffe, ‘Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces’, available at http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/pdfs/mouffe.pdf.
Chantal Mouffe, Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically, Verso Books 2013.
Timothy Morton “Poisoned Ground,” Symplokē 21, no. 1–2 (2013): 37–50. Available at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/sym/summary/v021/21.1-2.morton.html
Robert Zwijnenberg, ‘Presence and Absence: on Leonardo de Vinci’s John the Baptist’, in: Claire Farago and Robert Zwijnenberg (eds.), Compelling Visuality: The Work of Art in and out of History (1st edition), University of Minnesota Press 2003, pp. 112-131.
steirischer herbst and Florian Malzacher (eds), Truth is Concrete – a Handbook for Artistic Strategies in Real Politics. Sternberg Press 2015 
Registration Studeren à la carte and Contractonderwijs
All other information.