Please note: the digital learning environment of this course can be found in Brightspace. For information about enrolling, click here.
Entry requirements
Students who want to take this course need to be admitted to the master’s programme in Comparative Criminal Justice.
Course description
“The sentencing decision is the symbolic keystone of the criminal justice system: in it, the conflicts between the goals of equal justice under the law and individualized justice with punishment tailored to the offender are played out, and society’s moral principles and highest values – life and liberty – are interpreted and applied” (A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. Martin & M. Tonry (eds.) (1983) Research on Sentencing: The search for reform. Washington: National Academy Press)
The sentencing decision of the judge may be the most important decision in the criminal justice process. For this is where the decision is made on the consequences of the offense for the offender. Moreover, the public relies heavily on the imposed sentences to form its opinion on the performance of the judiciary. That makes sentencing not only relevant because of the impact the punishment has on the offender, it is also an important cornerstone of the legitimacy of the entire criminal justice system.
Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives, this course examines the empirical study of sentencing, its processes and outcomes. In particular, this course explores how we understand the exercise of judicial discretion in the criminal courts, and how we assess the fairness of the sentencing process and outcomes.
This course will examine sentencing processes and outcomes from international and historical perspectives, from the viewpoint of legal sentencing structures, from theoretical and policy perspectives, and with close attention to many problem-specific areas. Moreover, recent developments in sentencing law and practice will be discussed, thereby offering you a state-of-the-art insight into converging and diverging trends in sentencing within an international context.
Topics that you will be invited to explore include: the organization of courts, wrongful convictions, legitimacy of sentencing, sentencing theories and their application, and risk-based sentencing. These topics will be considered as they play out in current political and policy debates.
Basic elements of the Criminal Justice curriculum will be integrated in the current course. The matter will not only be approached from a legal point of view, but also from criminological and psychological perspectives. Methodology and statistics of criminological research will be critically discussed during the lectures when research findings are presented.
Course objectives
The objective of the course ‘Courts & Sentencing’ is to familiarize students with the role that criminal courts play in punishing offenders in different contexts, to provide understanding of sentencing theory, decision-making and research outcomes and to make them think critically about issues regarding the legitimacy of sentencing.
Upon completing this course, students will be able to:
Understand how court house symbolism and court room design relate to sentencing outcomes and legitimacy of sentencing
Understand the legal and psychological pitfalls for the judiciary when deciding on guilt and reflect upon the consequences of wrongful convictions for the legitimacy of the criminal justice system
Evaluate the legitimacy of sentencing and sentencing factors by applying moral justifications theories of sentencing and rule of law perspectives, and discuss the role of the public opinion on sentencing in relation to the legitimacy of sentencing.
Evaluate and compare the state of the art in scientific theories and results of empirical studies discussed during this course concerning sentencing and sentencing disparity.
Apply the above mentioned knowledge in different contexts when developing policies for sentencing reform.
Timetable
Choose bachelor or master.
Mode of instruction
The course consists of a weekly lecture and a weekly seminar. You are expected to prepare for the lectures by reading the literature assigned. Further, during every seminar a group assignment will be made, which needs individual preparation. Every week, a short (2-3 pages) individual paper is to be written. Together these form the portfolio.
Topics
Week 1: Court house symbolism and court room design in comparative perspective
Week 2: Wrongful convictions
Week 3: Legitimacy of sentencing and public opinion
Week 4: Sentencing disparity: occurrence and measures
Week 5: Risk-based sentencing
Assignments
Weekly group assignments during class, which need individual preparation
5 individual mini-papers about the group assignments which form the portfolio.
Assessment method
Weekly group assignments during class, which need individual preparation
5 individual mini-papers about the group assignments which form the portfolio.
Assessment method
A portfolio consisting of the individual mini-papers
Final written examination with open questions
Course grades are determined by
Portfolio (partial exam: 30%)
Written examination with open questions (partial exam: 70%)
All components should be at least 5,5 in order to complete the course successfully. If this is not the case, the lowest partial grade will be registered as final grade.
There will be a retake for both the written examination and the portfolio.
Depending on the number of participants, the course coordinator can decide that the retake for the written examination will be an oral examination. In that case, you will be timely notified.
The partial exams that have been finished with a passing grade, will be valid up to and including the academic year following the year in which the grade has been achieved. To this there is one exception: when the learning objectives, content, design or examination of a course has been changed, the course coordinator can decide that the validity of the partial exam concerned has expired due to didactic reasons. This will be stated in the course description of the academic year in which the change(s) will be implemented.
Regulation retake passed exams
In this course it is possible to retake an exam that has been passed (cf. art. 4.1.8.1 and further of the Course and Examination Regulations), on the condition that this course is included in the compulsory components of the degree programme. Students who have passed the exam may retake the final written assessment (test) of the course. Please contact the Student Administration Office (OIC) for more information, or check the course and exam enrolment on the students website.
Procedure for handing in the assignments
- All assignments must be submitted via Turnitin (Brightspace).
Employability and (academic) careerPreparation for the labor market
Participants train their skills in writing, collaborating, debating, and developing criminal justice policies.
Brightspace
The use of Brightspace is required. For information about enrolling, click here.
Reading list
Mandatory literature
- Assigned literature and the course guideline, both of which will be published on Blackboard.
Registration
Students can enroll for this course via uSis
Contact
Coordinator: mw. dr. mr. S.G.C. van Wingerden
Availability: Monday till Thursday, through the secretariat
Telephone: 071 – 527 74 62
E-mail: criminologie@law.leidenuniv.nl
Institute/department
Institute: Criminal Law and Criminology
Department: Criminology
Opening hours: 09.00 to 12.30
Telephone secretariat: 071 – 527 74 62
Room number: B3.11
E-mail: criminologie@law.leidenuniv.nl