This course examines some of the central debates in the philosophy of social science and links these debates to the historical origins and developments of the discipline of public administration. We will pay close attention to what philosophers usually call the problem of demarcation. This problem sets philosophers with the task of finding a principle on the basis of which one can distinguish science from non-science. The demarcation problem has occupied both philosophers of science in general and philosophers of public administration in particular. We will look at the different ways in which different authors have either tried to solve or contest the demarcation problem, and at the bearing this had on the social sciences and the discipline of public administration. In doing so, our aim is twofold. First, we will discuss the knowledge ideal of social science and public administration. Second, we will discuss how these questions help us define the knowledge object of public administration. What, in other words, belongs to the domain of public administration, and what do PA scholars study? Fundamental debates revolve around the question whether PA is actually a science or rather a purely practical endeavor and what – if anything – actually separates public administration from other related and often incorporated disciplines such as economics, politics or law. During the course, students will investigate where the study of public administration comes from and how and why it has developed over time and has come to be what it is today. Students will also gain knowledge of general philosophy of science to help them define and understand their chosen field of academic inquiry as well as the specific topics they will investigate and/or work with during their studies and later careers.
- Students will acquire knowledge of the historical origins and development of the study of public administration and gain a critical view of the way in which public administration scholars in past and present view public administration and government;
- Students will acquire skills of critical analysis and writing to link their knowledge and insight gained in this course to current cases and problems of governance.
- Students will become familiar with the philosophy of social science, the main debates in the discipline and the main approaches to the philosophy of social science.
- Students will acquire a close understanding of key debates and concepts relevant to the study of the philosophy of the social sciences.
- Students will acquire the analytical skills to understand, summarize and convey the main arguments in the literature, and approach them with a critical eye.
- Students should be able to articulate the ways in which the epistemological questions about the social sciences matter practically.
On the right side of programme front page of the E-guide you will find links to the website and timetables, uSis and Brightspace.
Mode of instruction
Lectures (attendance highly recommended)
Working groups/seminars (attendance compulsory)
No absence from the working groups is allowed, unless adequately justified (for example, a medical certificate or a message from the study advisor). If the student has an excuse for missing a working group, the student has to hand in an extra assignment (decided by the working group teacher) within one week following the working group the student did not attend. If the student does not hand in the extra assignment in time, the student will be excluded from further participating in the working group, which leads to a failure of the 2nd assignment for the course.
If the student provides no excuse for missing the working group, the student will have to hand in 2 extra assignments (decided by the working group teacher) within one week following the working group the student did not attend. Absent these 2 extra assignments, the student will be excluded from further participating in the working group, which leads to a failure of the 2nd assignment for the course.
According to established norms, a 5 ECTS course requires (5x28=) 140 hours of study. For this course the study load is roughly divided as follows:
Lectures (7x2): 14 hours
Seminars (7x2): 14 hours
Examination: 5 hours
Readings & Paper research / writing: 107 hours
1 paper assignment: 50% of the final grade
1 written exam: 50% of the final grade
The grade of both exams has to be 5.5 or higher
Compensation is not possible
From 2020-2021 onwards, partial grades will not remain valid after the exam and the resit of the course.
Resit written exam
Students that want to take part in a resit for a written exam, are required to register via uSis. Use the activity number that can be found on the ‘timetable exams’. For dates and times, please see course syllabus and roster online.
For further information about the University's exam rules please see: Rules and Regulations
- Dooremalen, H., De Regt, H., Schouten, M. 2007/2015. Exploring Humans. Philosophy for the Social Sciences. A Historical Introduction. Amsterdam: Boom. Additional articles will be added to the syllabus.
Register for every course and workgroup via uSis. Some courses and workgroups have a limited number of participants, so register on time (before the course starts). In uSis you can access your personal schedule and view your results. Registration in uSis is possible from four weeks before the start of the course.
From the academic year 2020-2021 Leiden University uses Brightspace as its online learning management system. After enrollment for the course in uSis you will be automatically enrolled in the Brightspace environment of this course.
Dr. A. Poama email@example.com