Admission requirements
Admission to this course is restricted to:
BA students in Philosophy: Global and Comparative Perspectives, who have successfully completed at least 70 ECTS credits of the mandatory components of the first and second year of their bachelor’s programme, including World Philosophies: Modern Europe, Concepts of Selfhood, Language and Thought, and at least one of the courses World Philosophies: China, World Philosophies: India, World Philosophies: Africa, World Philosophies: Middle East.
BA students in Filosofie, who have successfully completed at least 70 ECTS credits of the mandatory components of the first and second year of their bachelor’s programme, including Griekse en Romeinse filosofie, History of Modern Philosophy, Comparative Philosophy, Analytische filosofie or Philosophy of Mind.
Pre-master’s students in Philosophy who are in possession of an admission statement and who have to complete an advanced seminar, to be selected from package D.
Description
This course will engage students in the major debates about what was considered knowledge in the classical Indian and Chinese traditions. Special attention will be paid to the debates about pramanas or “means of knowledge” among the ancient Indian schools of Logic, Vedic Exegesis, Vedanta and Buddhist Logic, and to performative conceptions of zhi among classical Confucians, Mohists, Daoists and Legalists. The class will thoroughly familiarize students not merely with the spectrum views about knowledge among classical Indian and Chinese philosophers separately, but also with the divisive debates about what constitutes knowledge within each of these cultural heritages.
Course objectives
This course aims to acquaint students with the most prevelant philosophical conceptions of knowledge found in ancient and medieval Indian and Chinese philosophical schools.
Students who successfully complete the course will have a good understanding of:
how knowledge was variously conceived in classical India and China;
the relationship between conceptions of knowledge and forms of argument;
the theoretical and practical approaches to knowledge and their relationship.
Students who successfully complete the course will be able to:
- examine conceptions of knowledge in cross-cultural perspective.
Timetable
The timetables are available through My Timetable.
Mode of instruction
- Seminars
Class attendance is required.
Assessment method
Assessment:
Written, take-home examination with essay questions (paper)
Prepared questions for lectures
Attendance and participation in course and tutorial discussions
Weighting:
The final mark for the course is established by determination of the weighted average of several subtests:
Final semester paper 55%
In-class presentations: 25%
Lecture questions: 12%
Attendance and participation: 8%
Resit
The resit will consist of opportunity to resubmit the final semester paper that was not sufficient. The grades for other exam components remain in place.
Students who have obtained a satisfactory grade for the course cannot take the resit.
Inspection and feedback
Students will receive feedback on course presentations within one week of completing them.
Students will receive feedback on their research papers within 14 days, at the longest, of completing them.
Reading list
Course textbook: course readings will be provided through library reserves and Brightspace.
Course syllabus will be distributed via Brightspace.
Registration
Enrolment through MyStudymap is not possible for this course. Students are requested to submit their preferences for the third-year electives by means of an online registration form. They will receive the instruction and online registration form by email (uMail account); in June for courses scheduled in semester 1, and in December for courses scheduled in semester 2. Registration in uSis will be taken care of by the Education Administration Office.
Contact
For substantive questions, contact the lecturer listed in the information bar at the right hand side of the page.
For questions about enrolment, admission, etc., contact the Education Administration Office Huizinga
Remarks
Not applicable.