nl en

Good Research Practices


Please note: this course information is a direct copy from academic year 2023-2024. This information has not yet been adjusted to the new annual schedule which will be implemented within the Psychology programme from academic year 2024-2025 onwards. Additional changes in content may follow shortly.

Entry requirements

  • Introduction to Methodology and Statistics

  • Inferential Statistics

  • Experimental and Correlational Research (or similar courses)


Recently, the replicability of findings in Psychology—and with that the integrity of the literature—has been questioned, and several reforms for good research practices have been proposed as solutions. Papers about questionable research practices (QRP's) have fueled the reform, and we will discuss several of them in this course. Although QRP's such as selectively reporting ‘what works’ differ from fraud, they nevertheless hamper scientific progress. In this course we point out the many choices to be made in any psychological investigation and the decisions that lead to best research practices. For science to make progress, it is important that an investigation is reproducible. Reproducible research refers to the idea that research output such as the code, data, etc. are shared in order for others to be able to reproduce, verify and build on the work. In this course students acquire the skills to plan for reproducible research (e.g., by writing an analysis plan and documenting and archiving their work according to reproducibility principles). Knowledge of good research practices can help students perform better research themselves, and can help them evaluate papers or media items in the field of psychology now and in their future careers.

Course objectives

At the end of the course, the student can:

  • recognise and explain research decisions and practices that contribute to robustness, reproducibility, and replicability in psychological science

  • analyse pitfalls (e.g., Questionable Research Practices) in research projects and how to prevent them (e.g., by making a preanalysis plan);

  • critically evaluate published research from a research integrity perspective;

  • apply skills required to make research reproducible.


For the timetable of this course please refer to MyTimetable



Students must register themselves for all course components (lectures, tutorials and practicals) they wish to follow. You can register up to 5 days prior to the start of the course.


You must register for each exam in My Studymap at least 10 days before the exam date. Don’t forget! For more information, see the enrolment procedure.
You cannot take an exam without a valid registration in My Studymap.

Carefully read all information about the procedures and deadlines for registering for courses and exams.

Students who take this course as part of a LDE minor or a premaster programme, exchange students and external guest students will be informed by the education administration about the current registration procedure.

Mode of instruction

  • 4 2-hour lectures

  • 7 2-hour computer labs

Attendance at the workgroup sessions is mandatory. See Brightspace for more information.

In the work group sessions students work towards two assignments. The sessions consist of making a preanalysis plan and mock results section, student presentations of their plans, executing the planned analyses, documenting all steps in a reproducible way, and reviewing the report of another group.

Assessment method

The assignments together weigh 60% of the final grade and the exam weighs 40% of the final grade. The exam covers both the reading list and topics discussed during the lectures. Students are entitled to view their marked examination within a period of 30 days following the publication of the results of a written examination—more information about this will be posted on Brightspace. The entire course is in English, although students may opt to answer the open questions on the exam in Dutch.

The Institute of Psychology uses fixed rules for grade calculation. It also follows the policy of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences to systematically check student papers for plagiarism with the help of software. All students are required to take and pass the Scientific Integrity Test with a score of 100% in order to learn about the practice of integrity in scientific writing. Students are given access to the quiz via a module on Brightspace. Disciplinary measures will be taken when fraud is detected. Students are expected to be familiar with and understand the implications of these two policies.

Reading list

  • The most up to date full reading list will be available on Brightspace. This will consist of freely available literature and blogs.

Contact information

Dr. Anna van 't Veer