BA in Philosophy, or comparable level of knowledge
Scientific historiography is taken to be born after the mid 19th century when Ranke formulated his theory of history. The aim in scientific historiography was to write history ‘as it really happened’ and produce objective historical knowledge. However, since the early 1970s the narrativist turn in philosophy of history successfully questioned this ideal of objectivity. History is said to create narratives, such the ‘Industrial Revolution’ or the ‘Cold War,’ which do not correspond to anything in the past and cannot be evaluated in terms of their truthfulness and falsity. Although hardly any contemporary philosopher of history wishes to abandon rational evaluation of history, the post-narrativist philosophy of history has been left without a principled grounding and tools to enable this.
In this course, we will study the different kinds of answers that has been given to the problem of objectivity in the philosophy of history. We will be examining whether it is possible to defend the ideal of objectivity and rational evaluation of historical interpretations, while taking the insight of the narrativist philosophy of history into account.
Course objectives will be posted on Blackboard by the start of the course.
Mode of instruction
Seminar (lectures and seminar work)
- Participation and activity (10%)
- Seminar presentation (20%)
- Final paper (70%)
A selection of primary and secondary readings will be provided.
Exchange and Study Abroad students, please see the Study in Leiden website for information on how to apply
Dr. J. Kuukkanen: firstname.lastname@example.org
Specialisation: History and Philosophy of the Sciences