Due to the Corona virus education methods or examination can deviate. For the latest news please check the course page in Brightspace.


nl en

Scientific Review


Admission requirements

Mandatory Master courses, Junior Research Project 1 and 2.


A scientific review is an academic paper that provides a critique of relevant literature published on your field of investigation. Although a review uses no new data, it still provides an academic contribution through the interpretations made and the conclusions drawn. A good review provides a comprehensive summary of that field (comprehensive but not exhaustive- it should not become a textbook chapter). It demonstrates knowledge of and insight into relevant research done in the field. As well as describing research done, the review also provides a critique- a discussion of relevant debates, contradictory results, and disputed theoretical approaches. The review should identify key and innovative research and, where relevant, weaknesses in studies. The review should, in a well argued and substantiated manner, include the writer’s own evaluation, interpretation and conclusions.

Course objectives

The student has:

  • written a well-structured paper, suitable for publication in a scientific journal;

  • communicated ideas in a logical, well argued manner;

  • demonstrated understanding of and insight into the subject area;

  • identified and cited key contributors to the field;

  • recognized the current state of research in the field (frontier of science);

  • identified major debates e.g. conflicting theories/ contradictory findings;

  • demonstrated critical engagement with the subject through presenting own opinion/ interpretation using well-substantiated argumentation

Mode of instruction

Independent writing of a review with guidance and corrections by the scientific supervisor(s) and by Communication in Science tutors.

Assessment method

90% of the grade is determined by the content (JRP) supervisor and independent reviewer, and 10% by CIS.


  • For students in the de Research specialization this literature review (mandatory part of their master’s programme) should provide a critical discussion on the subject surrounding the research of JRP-II.

  • For students in other biomedical specializations this literature review may be included as an elective course and should preferably be linked to the subject surrounding JRP-I (or JRP-II)

  • Students in the Research specialization that have started their JRP2 before august 2012 are allowed to choose between writing a Master Thesis or writing a Scientific Review. They have to inform the examining board of their choice at least 6 weeks before the end date of their internship. When they choose writing a Scientific Review they have to send the subject of their Scientific Review for approval (see Blackboard for further information).