No extra admission requirements
The term 'crisis' dominates current public rhetoric. From the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, through the global financial crisis of 2007-2008 and up to the ongoing refugee crisis, citizens in Europe and elsewhere in the world feel that they live in a perpetual state of crisis or emergency. The framework of crisis as a perennial state or way of life resonates in various rearrangements in the Western political landscape: the rhetoric of fear of others (terrorists, Muslim fundamentalists, migrants, refugees), the popularity of anti-immigrant populist parties, the renewed rise of nationalism, the intensification of nostalgic restorative projects in a time of waning nation-state sovereignty, and the growing polarization between the European North and South.
The climate of 'crisis' can be associated with several eruptions of violence, riots, xenophobic attitudes, or grim diagnoses of the present in terms of (Western) ‘imperial’ decline and imminent barbarian invasions. But this landscape of ‘crisis’ has also given rise to various forms of activism, protest cultures, and attempts to rethink the future, devise alternative worldviews, and initiate global change. Many of these attempts take shape in literature and art, which are often called upon to provide alternative imaginative structures to conceive both the present and the future.
In this course, we will scrutinize the concept of ‘crisis,’ its history, and the implications of its manifold uses today. We will chart various manifestations of crisis – the financial crisis, the refugee crisis, the environmental crisis, terrorism etc. – and theoretical responses to the contemporary crisis-rhetoric by critics and philosophers including Giorgio Agamben, Sara Ahmed, Alain Badiou, Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Ipek Celik, David Graeber, and Chantal Mouffe. How is the framework of crisis produced and to what effects? Which discursive structures and figures of the other does crisis-rhetoric hinge on? What notions of temporality or conceptions of historical time are produced through dominant discourses of crisis today? And, last but not least, can we devise alternative grammars or vocabularies to talk about the above-outlined phenomena as scholars in the Humanities?
At the same time, we will delve into the debate on the function of literature in times of crisis. How does contemporary literature respond to ‘crisis’ in its various manifestations? Which tasks or functions are assigned to literature in this context? How do literary works imagine literature's relation to our realities and how do they respond to fears, desires, and anxieties that emerge in the context of the crisis? To tackle these questions, we will read and discuss novels (e.g. by J.M. Coetzee, Michel Houellebecq, Henning Mankell, and Zadie Smith), dramatic texts (e.g. by Anders Lustgarten), short stories (e.g. by Helen Simpson), poetry, but also graffiti art, and films that articulate complex responses to crisis or alternative visions of the present and the future.
Students who follow this course will:
gain in-depth knowledge of uses of the concept ‘crisis’ in various fields (social, cultural, political, philosophical)
be trained in probing the functions and effects of the crisis-rhetoric and acquire insight into various theoretical approaches that examine, question or oppose the idea of a perennial crisis
acquaint themselves with theoretical texts and literary works that propose alternative frameworks, vocabularies, and notions of subjectivity in a context of crisis
gain insight into current debates on the function of literature in crisis-times and acquaint themselves with literary works and other cultural objects that respond to the idea of crisis
Timetable on the website
Mode of instruction
280 hours Lectures: 42 hours Class preparations (readings): 148 Assessment (presentations, final paper): 90
- Class presentations and contributions to blackboard discussions
- Final paper
Active participation in class, written contributions to discussions on blackboard, and presentations in class (as listed under 1) will not be graded but are requisite to complete the course. The final mark for the course is established by the grade of the final paper. Should the final paper yield an insufficient grade, the student will be offered an opportunity for revising it.
The reading list will be made available on Blackboard.
Students have to apply for this course with the registration system of the university uSis.
General information about registration with uSis you can find here in Dutch and in English
Exchange and Study Abroad students, please see the Study in Leiden website for information on how to apply.
Media Studies student administration, P.N. van Eyckhof 4, room 102C. Tel. 071 5272144; .firstname.lastname@example.org.
Coordinator of studies: Mr. J. Donkers, MA, P.N. van Eyckhof 4, room 1.02b.