Admission requirements
Admission to this course is restricted to:
BA students in Filosofie, who have successfully completed at least 70 ECTS credits of the mandatory components of the first and second year of their bachelor’s programme, including History of Modern Philosophy, Logica, Epistemologie or Wetenschapsfilosofie, Analytische filosofie.
BA students in Philosophy: Global and Comparative Perspectives, who have successfully completed at least 70 ECTS credits of the mandatory components of the first and second year of their bachelor’s programme, including World Philosophies: Modern Europe, Logic, Epistemology or Philosophy of Science, Language of Thought.
Pre-master’s students in Philosophy who are in possession of an admission statement and who have to complete an advanced seminar, to be selected from package C.
Description
Philosophy is differentiated from the sciences through its focus on normative questions. What is a good argument? What is the good life? Are these norms determined by us? Would this mean that different people and cultures give different answers to these questions? Or do we presuppose that there is a norm of truth and goodness independent of our actual reasoning and living?
We start the course by reading three versions of a non-naturalist answer to the question of normativity (G. Frege, F. Brentano, G.E. Moore). The main focus of the course is to engage with contemporary discussions in logic by taking our departure in John MacFarlane’s paper ‘In what sense (if any) is logic normative for thought?’.
Ultimately, we will deal with normativity in metaethics. What can we learn about normativity if we thus compare logic and ethics?
Course objectives
A student who has successfully completed this course will have:
advanced knowledge of some of the central issues in the history of analytic philosophy;
some historical knowledge of central texts regarding normativity.
A student who has successfully completed this course will be able to:
connect philosophical issues in theoretical philosophy with comparative issues elsewhere in philosophy;
discuss naturalistic and non-naturalistic answers to the question of normativity, especially of contemporary authors;
develop a well-argued thesis on the question of normativity, to be presented in class and in a paper; positions of others are to be discussed in a balanced way.
Timetable
The timetables are available through MyTimetable.
Mode of instruction
Seminars;
Class attendance is required.
Assessment method
Assessment
- Paper.
Active participation during the seminar is a necessary condition for taking the exam.
Weighting
- Paper (100%).
Resit
Paper.
Inspection and feedback
There will always be feedback on papers within the official deadline for grading.
Reading list
The reading list will be made known in class and on Brightspace.
Registration
Enrolment through MyStudyMap is mandatory.
General information about course and exam enrolment is available on the website.
Contact
For substantive questions, contact the lecturer listed in the right information bar.
For questions about enrolment, admission, etc, contact the Education Administration Office: Huizinga.
Remarks
Not applicable.