All Semester II bachelor and master psychology courses and examinations (2020-2021) will be offered in an on-line format.
If it is safe and possible to do so, supplementary course meetings may be planned on-campus. However, attendance at these meetings will not be required to successfully complete Semester II courses.
All obligatory work groups and examinations will be offered on-line during Central European Time, which is local time in the Netherlands.
Information on the mode of instruction and the assessment method per course will be offered in Brightspace, considering the possibilities that are available at that moment. The information in Brightspace is leading during the Corona crisis, even if this does not match the information in the Prospectus.
The course focuses on the origins and development of a range of problems in childhood and adolescence (e.g. anxiety, depression, behavioural problems,intellectual disability, autism) taking the developmental psychopathology perspective as a theoretical framework. This framework provides a broad and developmentally orientated approach to understanding problems across the lifespan. It emphasises the relationship between normality and pathology, the complex interplay of multiple risk and protective factors, and developmental pathways such as continuity and change. Knowledge of the origin and development of problems experienced by young people is essential in the development of interventions to prevent and treat such problems. While this course does not focus on the treatment of problems experienced by young people, the final workgroup draws on students’ accruing knowledge of risk and protective factors to develop a preventive intervention.
Students prepare for future clinical and/or research work with young people by being able to:
identify standards to differentiate between normal and abnormal development in young people;
identify key features of the developmental psychopathology perspective;
identify key features of the empirical approach to classifying psychopathology;
critically evaluate the DSM by specifying at least 4 problems with the classification system;
identify the DSM criteria used to classify psychopathology in young people;
identify age and gender trends associated with psychopathology in young people;
identify risk factors and processes associated with the problems experienced by young people; and
critically evaluate the methods and instruments that are used to assess cognition involved in young people’s internalising problems.
Students prepare for work in the broader field of psychology by being able to:
- apply a theoretical model (a model of psychopathology) to the development of problems (internalizing behaviour in a young person).
For the timetables of your lectures, work group sessions, and exams, see the timetables page of your study programme. You will also find the enrolment codes here. Psychology timetables
Students need to register for lectures, workgroups and exams. Instructions for registration in courses for the 2nd and 3rd year
Elective students have to enroll for each course separately. For admission requirements contact your exchange coordinator.
Students are not automatically enrolled for an examination. They can register via uSis from 100 to 10 calendar days before the date; students who are not registered will not be permitted to take the examination. Registering for exams
Mode of instruction
8 2-hour lectures. The lectures serve to enhance student learning of the textbook materials as well as to introduce additional materials that are not covered in the textbook.
4 2-hour work-group sessions (in English or Dutch; exchange students should ensure they register for an English-language workgroup; IBP students will automatically be enrolled in English-language workgroups). Various problem areas are addressed in greater depth in the work group sessions. The activities include reviewing video material, becoming familiar with assessment tools, evaluating scientific articles, and discussing the application of the developmental psychopathology framework to case material.
2 graded assignments (such as reviewing empirical studies or applying theoretical models to case material). In addition, students will prepare various non-graded (but mandatory) assignments prior to the work group sessions. Such assignments serve as preparation for the workgroups.
1 optional practice exam (does not count towards final mark for the course, but helps to prepare for the final exam).
The total workload of the course is 140 hours (5 EC), made up of:
16 hours lectures
80 hours preparation for lectures
8 hours workgroup sessions
36 hours assignments (preparation for work group sessions)
Component 1: multiple-choice exam at the end of Block 1, worth 80% of the overall course mark.
Component 2: 2 workgroup assignments (20% of course mark).
Students whose mark for component 1 is lower than 5 will need to take the resit in January. Active participation in all work group sessions is mandatory. Students are allowed to miss one work group session at most.
The Institute of Psychology uses fixed rules for grade calculation and compulsory attendance. It also follows the policy of the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences to systematically check student papers for plagiarism with the help of software. Disciplinary measures will be taken when fraud is detected. Students are expected to be familiar with and understand the implications of these three policies.
- Wicks-Nelson, R., & Israel, A. C. (2015). Abnormal child and adolescent psychology with DSM-V updates (8th Ed.). Amsterdam: Pearson. (Approximate cost: 75 euro; 75% of the text is prescribed reading.)
Readings available via Blackboard. Exemplary literature includes:
Bellina, M., Brambilla, P., Garzitto, M., Negri, G.A.L., Molteni, M., & Nobile, M. (2013). The ability of CBCL DSM-oriented scales to predict DSM-IV diagnoses in a referred sample of children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22. 235-246.
Blote, A., Miers, A.C., Heyne, D.A., Clark, D.M., & Westenberg, P.M. (2014). The relation between social anxiety and audience perception: Examining Clark and Wells’ (1995) model among adolescents. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42, 555-567.
Cohen, J.R., Young, J.F., & Abela, J.R.Z. (2012). Cognitive vulnerability to depression in children: An idiographic, longitudinal examination of inferential styles. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36. 643-654.
Havik, T., Bru, E., & Ertesvag, S.K. (2014). Parental perspectives of the role of school factors in school refusal. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 19, 131-153.
Heyne, D. A., & Sauter, F. M. (2013). School refusal. In C. A. Essau, & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the treatment of childhood and adolescent anxiety. (pp. 471-517). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Limited.
Hong, J.S., Lee, C.-H., Lee, J., Lee, N.Y., & Garbarino, J. (2014). A review of bullying prevention and intervention in South Korean schools: An application of the social–ecological Framework. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 45, 433-442.
Neil, A. L., & Christensen, H. (2009). Efficacy and effectiveness of school-based prevention and early intervention programs for anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 29. 208-215.
Course coordinator: Dr. Evelien Broekhof email@example.com