nl en

Master's project



An important part of the master’s programme is the Master’s project. In working on the master’s project, students learn to integrate the knowledge, skills and academic attitude that they have acquired in the course of their studies.

For more information and a special brochure about the Master’s project with useful tips and guidelines, please also refer to our website about the Master’s project (Dutch) or in English

Choosing a topic
A master’s project is directly linked to the ongoing research which is subsumed under one of the lines of research of the Institute for Education and Child Studies. Staff announces which projects are available for participation and students can register for one of these.

The project proposal
A master’s project must be well prepared. This preparation should result in a clear, structured project proposal, including a realistic time schedule. The importance of a good project design cannot be overemphasized. A clear project plan offers direction and help in carrying out the master’s project, and good planning of the activities offers both the student and the supervising staff member the possibility to evaluate the project’s progress.

The implementation phase of a master’s project can only begin once the project proposal has been approved by both the first and the second supervisor.
The project proposal should include the following:
1. the title (or preliminary title) of the master’s project;
2. a short introduction including the aim and the background of the study, as well as the research question;
3. the theoretical context of the study;
4. the structure of the research, including the research design and methods;
5. the time schedule of the different stages of the research project;
6. a preliminary literature list.

The results of the master’s project are presented on a symposium for fellow-students, lecturers and guests. The schedule of presentation dates and deadlines will be announced. The student enrolls via the form on this same webpage. The first supervisor needs to sign the enrollment form for consent.

Supervision of the master’s project
The first supervisor is one of the lecturers/staff members. This first supervisor offers support in determining the topic, making contacts within the field and during the process of writing the various parts of the thesis. Moreover, this supervisor also monitors the progress of the master’s project.
The second supervisor evaluates the project proposal and must approve it. In addition, the second supervisor evaluates the final result (the master’s thesis). The second supervisor participates in the supervision process through the first supervisor and has, generally speaking, no contact with the student. At any stage of the project the first supervisor can, if necessary, ask for advice from the second supervisor, or involve him in contacts with the student.

Course objectives

Achievement levels: 1-19.
The general objective of the Master’s project is acquiring experience with the practice of research in Education and Child Studies, in which all elements of empirical research must be included. During the Master’s project students conduct research into a subject which is directly linked to research in one of the specializations of the Master’s Programme. Students formulate a research question, make a research design (including the methodological, ethical and practical implications), study relevant literature, collect and analyse data, draw conclusions and write a research report.


Meetings are planned by the supervisor and collaborating students themselves. Regular meetings with the thesis supervisor are foreseen.
For more information please refer to the timetable of your Master’s specialisation.

Mode of instruction

Individual research under supervision.

Assessment method

Written research report and presentation. The final report of the master’s project (the thesis) should be no longer than 30 A4 pages with 1.5 line spacing and font size 12 (excluding appendices). The thesis should also include a summary of a maximum of 300 words. This summary should succinctly inform about the context of the research, the research question, the research design, the results and the most important conclusions. The lay-out of the thesis must conform to the publication guidelines of the American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association. (2006). Publication Manual of the American Psychological association (6th ed.). Washington: Author.).

Once a master’s project has been completed, the final report (the thesis) and the implementation of the project are evaluated by the first and the second supervisor. The final version of the Master’s thesis should be submitted through Ephorus and in print.

The evaluation may take no more than three weeks. By the end of this period, at the latest, the student will be informed whether or not the report is of sufficient quality and what the final mark is. The final mark consists of the average of the marks given by the first and the second supervisor.

There are six global criteria involved in evaluating a thesis and in conducting the research, which are:

  1. Degree of autonomy
  • intensity of supervision

  • use of the supervisor’s feedback

  • sufficiently independent work

  1. Structure and legibility of the thesis
  • orderly lay-out and division into chapters and sections

  • clear formulations, correct use of language

  • consistent theme, internal consistency thesis consistent with the publication guidelines of the APA

  1. Compilation and processing of literature
  • relevant scientific literature has been studied

  • literature has been adequately processed

  • the APA guidelines have been applied

  1. Data collection and research skills
  • research attitude

  • systematic description of the research method applied

  • sufficiently explicit steps

  • methodological justification of the chosen procedure

  • adequate methods of collecting materials

  • proposal correctly implemented? All changes reported and justified

  1. Processing and description of research results
  • adequate methods of analysis, sufficiently justified

  • sufficient depth of analysis of the materials

  • correct description of the results and the interpretation

  • the conclusions and recommendations match the results

  1. Discussion
  • reflection on research results on the basis of theory and previous research

  • different points of view sufficiently distinguished and contrasted

  • reflection on scientific and social consequences and relevance

  • originality

The presentation is judged sufficient/not sufficient by the chairman of the symposium.


Relevant literature on the research topic.

Contact information

Contact persons per specialisation are: